In the fashion circle "copy" is a very sensitive vocabulary, someone to its detest, someone to its inwardly rejoice; Some of it praised, for someone to avoid it if a. But anyway, "copy" phenomenon exists in fashionable circle, just objects and methods have different gimmick.
Before every guest happen "copied door" incident to media commentators very irritability, give rivals were happy, but also let like every guest garment consumers very frustrated. Every guest website before sales famous American designer suspected plagiarism FlyingMouse and American T-shirt website Woot design originality Shirt. The T-shirt. This type of t-shirts,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], no matter from design, color or design style perspective, all with the same FlyingMouse design. Every guest sincere product given reason is fully, simple and crude questioning is of stylist does not respect and emphasizes design originality norms.
Actually, "copied door" event is garment industry "mutual reference" phenomenon of the iceberg. Even if "every guest original style" be timely shelf, every guest's old total vin timely admitted mistakes and make an apology, relevant spokesman also suggests that later want "more strict completes the original design management".
And when we all turn tabloids, a stretch of fortress dress makes everyone "eye-opening". The most famous than l fortress dress incident involving has produced a galaxy of "involved" actress. For FanJiHui fortress gowns make l also calculate plate-making masters, he acknowledged that many mainland actress took pictures of assessing find he copied dress, but not admit doing something in copying.
This lets long-term concerned fashionable people surprised to discover, originally the entire clothing all are unable with copying iota clear relationship.
In Spain brand Zara, for example, copying the design is not big day,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], as it is in itself in the long history of brand copied out. Zara ever published a seasonal product pictures,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], there are two dresses, respectively for the cat and the swallow as patterns. Even not how bright eye people will find, no matter design or color, it is exactly like him in assessing MiuMiu previously released on serial works. Facing a misgivings about, Zara given reason also very fully: "we get from fashion show T stage of inspiration, not finished plagiarism."
A word is called: existence namely reasonable. Of course, this is also a controversial remarks, but at least means a truth: widely exists; inevitably has its existing reason.
Drive all guest do it? What's the main reason? We all know,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], clothing must through constant originality, constantly update quickly meet consumers fashionable requirement of inner motivation. "Faster", "update", and is a basic law of clothing survival. Therefore, with all guest this kind of practice, we needn't fuss.
With H&M, Zara brand such as, for example, each year of these brands analysts occupying assessing front row gold position, in a couple of weeks after the deep each stylist the quintessence of similar products into the market, big morning than six months not to say, the price also exceptionally cheap. This phenomenon, ordinary consumers nature is not boycott and "is for reference" bellowed big-shot except complain, and can only be stranded. On the one hand technical difficult to define whether they constitute infringement, sheet is so much similar products a piece accuse bottom go to, is a chore. On the other hand, who know their own is borrowed from somewhere which elements?
Actually, it is necessary for us to make clear the difference between plagiarism and reference. Plagiarism refers to steal other people's works as your own, including material copied exactly a work of another and to a certain extent to change its form or content of the behavior. For reference in understanding on the basis of summarization, then create play has its own things.
When we look back on domestic and international every fashion week, every year make magnificent and victorious, everybody is very curious, adept concern is what? In fact, adept the focus is on the fabric of choice, clipping skill, plate-making technology and so on have innovative breakthrough - these detail is connoisseur of excitement.
But each year, two season plus advanced customization fashion, in such a short time, technological and artistic innovation task already very hard, want to prop up such a few fashion show, designers besides say-can desperately looking for inspiration outside, the most effective solutions is reviewing the past, forward man scriptures, once big heat, popular element from old pile interprets, slightly disguise, again to market. The resulting result, fashion into a few years a rebirth cycle - if you have any outdated clothes, don't lose, again lead several years it would surely popular.
In fact, in any industry, creative genius is always a few, most people do the work with copying others how many achievements of trace. While in fashionable circle has a failed to be explained riddles, and that is why plainly design elements, the most important protean those a few stylist is always in the same season choose some exactly the same ideas?
Had the professionals said: "an excellent designer clothing, besides have great design talents, always focus on popular trend is also the necessary skills."
If this statement is established, then in fashion fields, from the learning design itself part of ownership. Problem is, reference to what extent can be regarded as a copy? Apart from whether they deliberately, but such savage creative identical and itself is and consumer big joke.